Adapting evidence to local context
|
Anonymous 21/09/2009 |
|
|
dciliska 22/09/2009 |
|
|
Mongeon, Amanda 20/10/2009 |
|
|
Ciliska, Donna 21/10/2009 |
|
Méthodes et outils d’application des connaissances en santé publique.
Articles ayant fait l'objet d'une estimation critique de la McMaster Health Knowledge Refinery.
Publications et matériel du CCNMO.
GRATUIT! Modules d'apprentissage en ligne.
Découvrir, utiliser et partager ce qui fonctionne en santé publique.
Ateliers et activités tenus par le CCNMO un peu partout au Canada.
Réseau pour les professionnels de la santé publique un peu partout au Canada.
Renseignez-vous sur DialogueSP
Plateforme permettant aux membres du réseau DialogueSP de partager des renseignements, des ressources, des trucs et des solutions.
Université McMaster
1685, rue Main Ouest, bureau 302
Hamilton, ON L8S 1G5
Téléphone : 905-525-9140, poste 20450
Télécopieur : 905-529-4184
Site Web : www.nccmt.ca ou www.ccnmo.ca
|
Anonymous 21/09/2009 |
|
|
dciliska 22/09/2009 |
Great question - unfortunately, there is no great answer! The best you can do is go by the judgement of what you and your colleagues know about your community. You have to think about how the context of your community is similar and different from that described in the study.
The other key element is to not 'water down" the intervention by giving it at a lower intensity....which will decrease the likelihood of a similar effect. If the intervention is the same (quality and intensity), then confidence in getting the same result depends on how much you think the intervention is affected by a different community and population. The net step in the cycle is critical - EVALUATION! The evaluation does not have to be a randomized trial, but some collection of outcome data (preferably before/after) so that you can compare if the changes your participants are similar to those experienced by the study population. Donna |
|
Mongeon, Amanda 20/10/2009 |
To take this further, and to clarify my own learning around this experience of applying research to local contexts, is that once we've evaluated, it is important to share the evaluation findings. Am I correct in understanding that the best way to accumulate/develop some "best practices" is to find those interventions that in fact are successful across a multitude of contexts and communities, based on the experiences of those who have tried them out?
Amanda. |
|
Ciliska, Donna 21/10/2009 |
Hi Amanda,
You are absolutely right - once you have evaluated, it is important to share that evaluation so that we can build our understanding of the effect of that intervention in different communities and different contexts. That is called "practice-based evidence". We currently do not have a good way of doing that accumulation and sharing. One project that has just begun, whose purpose is exactly that, is the CAPTURE (CANADIAN PLATFORM TO INCREASE USAGE OF REAL‐WORLD EVIDENCE) project. Capture Project We look forward to the progress of the CAPTURE program to help us with common evaluations and sharing the results of those evaluations. Donna |
© 2012 Centre de Collaboration Nationale des Méthodes et Outils