Home
Repositories
- The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
- Health Evidence™
- Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
Training
- Videos
- Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
- Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Online Learning Modules
- University-Certified Learning Module Program
- Webinars
- Workshops
- Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
- Knowledge Broker Virtual Office Hours
Tools
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
- 6S Search Pyramid
- Anatomy of a Systematic Review
- Rapid Review Guidebook
- EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
- Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
- Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
- Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
- Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
- Core Competency Tool
- Mental Health Resources for Healthcare Workers
Rapid Evidence Service
Impact
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
- Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
- Why It Matters
- NCCMT Publications
- User Stories
- Outreach
- KT Student Awards
About Us
- About the NCCMT
- Our Funder
- Our Host Institution
- The National Collaborating Centres
- Team Members
- Advisory Group Members
- Students
- COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
- Contact Us
Access My Dashboard

- Home
- Repositories
  - The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
  - Health Evidence™
  - Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
- Training
  - Videos
  - Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
  - Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Online Learning Modules
  - University-Certified Learning Module Program
  - Webinars
  - Workshops
  - Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
    
    KB Mentoring Impact
  - Knowledge Broker Virtual Office Hours
- Tools
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
  - 6S Search Pyramid
  - Anatomy of a Systematic Review
  - Rapid Review Guidebook
  - EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
  - Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
  - Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
  - Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
  - Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
  - Core Competency Tool
  - Mental Health Resources for Healthcare Workers
- Rapid Evidence Service
- Impact
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
  - Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
  - Why It Matters
  - NCCMT Publications
  - User Stories
  - Outreach
  - KT Student Awards
- About Us
  - About the NCCMT
  - Our Funder
  - Our Host Institution
  - The National Collaborating Centres
  - Team Members
  - Advisory Group Members
  - Students
  - COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
  - Contact Us

How to Define 'Best Practice' for Use in Knowledge Translation Research: A Practical, Stepped and Interactive Process

Bosch, M., Tavender, E., Bragge, P., Gruen, R., & Green, S. (2013). How to define 'best practice' for use in knowledge translation research: A practical, stepped and interactive process. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19(5), 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01835.x

Journal article

Description

This method helps users develop best-practice recommendations that are actionable, locally applicable and consistent with the best available research-based evidence.

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The method guides users through two phases:

Phase 1 – Finding and assessing global evidence:

Identify current, high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and extract recommendations.
Select strong recommendations in key clinical management areas.
Update evidence and create evidence overviews.
Discuss evidence and produce agreed “evidence statements.”

Phase 2 – Assessing the relevance of the evidence to the local setting:

Discuss the relevance of the evidence with local stakeholders.
Develop locally applicable, actionable, best-practice recommendations.

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.