webinar summary

Worksheets to guide knowledge transfer and exchange initiatives

A summary of

Reardon, R., Lavis, J., & Gibson, J. (2006). From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide. Retrieved from http://www.iwh.on.ca/from-research-to-practice

How to cite this NCCMT summary:

National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2010). Worksheets to guide knowledge transfer and exchange initiatives. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. (Updated 20 April, 2010) Retrieved from http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/42.

Categories: Tool, Synthesize, Implement, Evaluate, Communication, Knowledge dissemination, KT plan, Organizational capacity and management, Program planning

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

Relevance for Public Health

The Institute for Work & Health developed the tools contained in this planning guide. The Institute’s focus is on occupational health and safety. The two main objectives of their research are 1) keeping workers healthy and preventing work-related injury and illness; and 2) improving the health and recovery of injured workers. However, the language used to guide users through the worksheets is generic, making it useful for others, including those working in public health.

Description

Developed by the Institute of Work & Health, this guide helps users navigate the complexities of planning a knowledge transfer project. The worksheets contained in this planning guide were designed to be used in conjunction with a facilitated workshop on knowledge transfer and exchange. However, they also provide the user with a series of factors to consider when planning for the maximum uptake of knowledge transfer initiatives. The researchers briefly describe three knowledge transfer models (producer push, user pull and exchange). They place particular emphasis on the importance of building relationships for knowledge exchange.

The four worksheets are based on the five questions that underlie the organizing framework for knowledge transfer, as proposed by Lavis et al. (2003):

  1. What should be transferred?
  2. To whom should the message be transferred?
  3. By whom should the message be transferred?
  4. How should the message be transferred?
  5. With what effect/impact should the message be transferred?

These questions lead the user through the process of defining the appropriate message(s), audience(s), messenger(s), transfer method(s) and approach(es) for evaluating the impact of the knowledge transfer project.

Implementing the Method/Tool
Steps for Using Method/Tool

This toolkit guides users through a series of steps designed to help them plan their knowledge transfer project by identifying:

  • the intended audience(s) with whom they wish to communicate
  • the type of and structure of the message(s) they wish to communicate
  • actual or potential barriers and facilitators to be considered in planning transfer strategy
  • the most appropriate person(s) to deliver the message
  • the most effective and feasible mechanism(s) to transfer the message(s)
  • desired outcomes and the defined impact of the knowledge transfer project
  • measures and indicators required to demonstrate evidence of impact
Who is involved

Public/community health nurses, health promotion officers, epidemiologists, health and policy analysts, research and evaluation specialists, public health/community dieticians and other members of the inter-professional public health team are likely to find these series of tools useful when planning a knowledge translation initiative. Targeted audiences may include groups such as public health practitioners, decision makers, policy makers, program funders, community-based organizations and the community at large.

Conditions for Use

Copyright © 2006 Institute for Work & Health

Evaluation and Measurement Characteristics
Evaluation
Information not available
Validity
Not applicable
Reliability
Not applicable
Methodological Rating
Not applicable
Method/Tool Development
Developer(s)

Ms. Rhonda Reardon
Formerly of the Institute for Work & Health

Ms. Jane Brenneman Gibson
Director, Knowledge Transfer & Exchange Institute for Work & Health

Dr. John Lavis
Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange Director, McMaster Health Forum Professor, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Member, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Associate Member, Department of Political Science McMaster University

Method of Development

Health care practitioners with experience in knowledge transfer and exchange at the Institute for Work & Health developed this planning guide. The worksheets are based on five questions that make up a framework for planning and organizing knowledge transfer strategies (Lavis et al., 2003). The worksheets feature information about translation strategies/ mechanisms and how to assess their effectiveness (Grimshaw et al., 2001).

Release Date
2006
Contact Person/Source

Ms. Jane Brenneman Gibson
Institute for Work & Health
481 University Avenue, 8th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E9
416-927-2027 extension 2173

Resources

Title of Primary Resource
From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide
File Attachment
None
Web-link
Reference

Reardon, R., Lavis, J., & Gibson, J. (2006). From research to practice: A knowledge transfer planning guide. Retrieved from http://www.iwh.on.ca/from-research-to-practice

Type of Material
Workbook
Format
On-line Access
Cost to Access
None.
Language
English
Conditions for Use
Copyright © 2006 Institute for Work & Health

Title of Supplementary Resource
How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision-makers?
File Attachment
None
Web-link
Reference

Lavis, J., Robertson, D., Woodside, J., McLeod. B., Abelson, J., and the Knowledge Transfer Study Group. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision-makers? The Millbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221-248.

Type of Material
Journal article
Format
Periodical
Cost to Access
Journal article purchase
Language
English
Conditions for Use
Copyright © 2003 Millbank Memorial Fund

Have you used this resource? Share your story!