Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies

Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing. 2004;1(3):176-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x. PMID: 17163895.

Canadian Template available Evaluated/validated

Description

This critical appraisal tool can be used when doing knowledge synthesis. It provides a standardized approach to assessing overall study quality based on eight categories and to developing recommendations for study findings.

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The manual walks users through the tool and provides guidance on how to rate methodological quality for each of the questions in the eight sections of the tool:

  1. Selection bias
  2. Study design
  3. Confounders
  4. Blinding
  5. Data collection methods
  6. Withdrawals and dropouts
  7. Intervention integrity
  8. Analysis

Once all questions have been answered, users rate the overall methodological quality of the research article.

Evaluation

Thomas B.H., Ciliska D., Dobbins M., Micucci S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x

Validity

Thomas B.H., Ciliska D., Dobbins M., Micucci S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x

Reliability

Thomas B.H., Ciliska D., Dobbins M., Micucci S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.

Have you used this resource? Share your story!