Guide to community preventive services data abstraction method

Briss et al. (2000). Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services – Methods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1S), 35-43.

Description

“Developing an Evidence-Based Guide to Community Preventive Services—Methods” is a process for ‘doing’ knowledge synthesis. This method is defined as part of the creation of the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations. This method adds to a developing body of literature on conducting syntheses, specifically for clinical preventive services and medical care. While empirical evidence is only one element in decision-making, decisions about the appropriate responses to public health problems have been made with incomplete empirical evidence.

This evidence-based approach to synthesis is intended to reduce errors in information collection and interpretation, and to enhance the strength of recommendations arising from public health literature. There are eight steps involved in retrieving, evaluating and synthesizing evidence into recommendations. This document provides details on each step of the process. For more information on the tool used for assessing and summarizing the interventions, please see the “Guide to Community Preventive Services Data Abstraction Form”.

Steps for Using Method/Tool

There are eight steps involved in Guide to Preventive Services systematic review:

  1. Forming multidisciplinary chapter development teams of 4-10 individuals;
  2. Developing a conceptual approach to organizing, grouping, selecting and evaluating the interventions in each chapter;
  3. Defining key areas on which to focus, and select or develop a logic framework;
  4. Selecting interventions to be evaluated;
  5. Searching for and retrieving evidence;
  6. Assessing the quality and summarizing the body of evidence of effectiveness;
  7. Translating the body of evidence of effectiveness into recommendations; and
  8. Identifying and summarizing research gaps

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.

Have you used this resource? Share your story!