Title Predicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales.
Authors Carter G, Milner A, McGill K, Pirkis J
Source Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 16. pii: bjp.bp.116.182717. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.182717.
Relevance Rating 6.00
Newsworthiness Rating 6.00
Abstract BackgroundPrediction of suicidal behaviour is an aspirational goal for clinicians and policy makers; with patients classified as `high risk` to be preferentially allocated treatment. Clinical usefulness requires an adequate positive predictive value (PPV).AimsTo identify studies of predictive instruments and to calculate PPV estimates for suicidal behaviours.MethodA systematic review identified studies of predictive instruments. A series of meta-analyses produced pooled estimates of PPV for suicidal behaviours.ResultsFor all scales combined, the pooled PPVs were: suicide 5.5% (95% CI 3.9-7.9%), self-harm 26.3% (95% CI 21.8-31.3%) and self-harm plus suicide 35.9% (95% CI 25.8-47.4%). Subanalyses on self-harm found pooled PPVs of 16.1% (95% CI 11.3-22.3%) for high-quality studies, 32.5% (95% CI 26.1-39.6%) for hospital-treated self-harm and 26.8% (95% CI 19.5-35.6%) for psychiatric in-patients.ConclusionsNo `high-risk` classification was clinically useful. Prevalence imposes a ceiling on PPV. Treatment should reduce exposure to modifiable risk factors and offer effective interventions for selected subpopulations and unselected clinical populations.

The full text may be available from PubMed.