Home
COVID-19
- Rapid Evidence Service
- Coping with COVID-19 | Mental health resources for healthcare workers
- COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
- COVID-END Listserv
Training
- Videos
- Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
- Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Online Learning Modules
- University-Certified Learning Module Program
- Webinars
- Workshops
- Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
Tools
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
- 6S Search Pyramid
- Anatomy of a Systematic Review
- Rapid Review Guidebook
- EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
- Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
- Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
- Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
- Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
- Core Competency Tool
Knowledge Repositories
- The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
- Health Evidence™
- Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
- Public Health +
Impact
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
- Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
- Why It Matters
- NCCMT Publications
- User Stories
- Outreach
About Us
- About the NCCMT
- Our Funder
- Our Host Institution
- The National Collaborating Centres
- Team Members
- Advisory Group Members
- Students
- Contact Us
Access My Dashboard

- Home
- COVID-19
  - Rapid Evidence Service
  - Coping with COVID-19 | Mental health resources for healthcare workers
  - COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
  - COVID-END Listserv
- Training
  - Videos
  - Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
  - Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Online Learning Modules
  - University-Certified Learning Module Program
  - Webinars
  - Workshops
  - Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
    
    KB Mentoring Impact
- Tools
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
  - 6S Search Pyramid
  - Anatomy of a Systematic Review
  - Rapid Review Guidebook
  - EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
  - Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
  - Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
  - Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
  - Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
  - Core Competency Tool
- Knowledge Repositories
  - The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
  - Health Evidence™
  - Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
  - Public Health +
- Impact
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
  - Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
  - Why It Matters
  - NCCMT Publications
  - User Stories
  - Outreach
- About Us
  - About the NCCMT
  - Our Funder
  - Our Host Institution
  - The National Collaborating Centres
  - Team Members
  - Advisory Group Members
  - Students
  - Contact Us

Understanding Evidence: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tool

Puddy, R. W. & Wilkins, N. (2011). Understanding evidence part 1: Best available research evidence. A guide to the continuum of evidence of effectiveness. Retrieved from Center for Disease Control and Prevention website: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/UnderstandingEvidence.html

Canadian

Example available

Description

This tool helps practitioners, policy-makers and researchers understand research evidence. The tool exists within the CDC Understanding Evidence tool, a guidance document that clarifies and defines standards of rigour across six dimensions that make up the best available research evidence for evidence-informed decision making.

The continuum can be used:

to learn about the best available research evidence
as part of a process for making decisions about which strategies to implement
to identify which aspects of an initiative’s research evidence could be improved

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The tool guides users through two aspects of the best available research evidence:

Strength of evidence
Effectiveness of the program or policy

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.