Conceptualizing and Combining Evidence for Health System Guidance

Lomas, J., Culyer, T., McCutcheon, C., McAuley, L., & Law, S. (2005). Conceptualizing and Combining Evidence for Health System Guidance. Retrieved from the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement.

Canadian En français

Description

This tool uses a deliberative process to bring together three categories of evidence for decision-making at the health systems level: medical effectiveness research (context-free scientific evidence); social science-oriented research (context-sensitive scientific evidence); and the expertise, views and realities of stakeholders (colloquial evidence).

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The tool guides users through two sections, supplemented by examples, scenarios and additional resources:

Section 1: What counts as evidence?

Section 2: Deliberative process for combining forms of evidence

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.

Have you used this resource? Share your story!